Changing British Attitudes on Animal Testing
British attitudes on animal testing can seem to fluctuate, partly because one minute the news is publishing a major incident of animal extremism and then the next, we are reading about public opinion polls citing support of animal testing for medical benefits. Animal testing seems to have remained a controversial subject, with no shortage of verbal supporters on both sides, often with the public and the research sector pitted against one another.
Polling to Understand British Attitudes on Animal Testing
Polls are an obvious approach to learn what Britons think of animal testing. A recent government poll found that almost three quarters of Britons approved of animal testing if it was for medical purposes. However, just under twenty percent cited that it was totally unacceptable, no matter what kind of circumstances exist. There were comments about stricter regulations on animal testing although some people believed that this would cause animal testing in Britain to be forced elsewhere in the world, where regulations would likely be far more relaxed than the very stringent laws here.
Attitudes towards extremists were similarly mixed, although the majority were on the side of peaceful protests. Most people supported the notion of peaceful demonstrations while violence and aggression were generally not supported tactics. A very tiny two percent believed that it was acceptable to damage the property of those involved in animal testing and half of that amount actually thought that death threats were appropriate behaviour.
Still, polls do vary and a poll taken only a year beforehand found that fifty percent of people supported animal testing for medical purposes. However, some polls tend to be worded in more extremist ways, where a person has to either agree that all animal testing is acceptable or that no animal testing under any circumstances is acceptable.
Mixed Views on Animal Testing
The data seems to show that the average Briton has a mixed view of animal testing. For medical purposes, it is acceptable to most but it is otherwise unacceptable for cosmetics purposes to test on animals. People would support tighter regulations if they actually felt these laws would be effective at keeping local companies up to the right ethical standard without sending them elsewhere in the world. Views are also highly supportive of alternatives to animal testing wherever they can be successfully used.A poll from two years ago looked at the specifics of animal pain and the use of different animals. A small but still surprising number of people at ten percent thought that cosmetic research was an acceptable use for animals, even if the animals experienced pain. If it was for cancer, however, the number rose to more than half of all respondents supporting animal testing.
Future of British Attitudes on Animal Testing
It is expected that as animal testing in the laboratory changes, British attitudes will similarly continue to change. New methods of testing are helping to reduce and replace modes of animal testing, which means that those who do support testing may begin to accept these new alternatives as favourable to using animals, particularly those that are more cost-effective and rapid. Animal extremists do not appear ready to quiet down anytime soon; they will likely continue to voice their anger and concerns regarding the use of animals in testing.However, it does seem that for now, most people are supportive of using animal testing for medical purposes that can enhance and extend human life. At the same time, animal testing on cosmetics is largely unfavourable and the ban on animal testing for cosmetics has generally been a welcomed one by the public. While the public can't be in complete agreement, it does seem that there is a greater commitment to learning about animal testing and making more informed choices about its use.
- Animal Rights Activists Targeting Scientists
- Scientists Against Animal Testing
- Pet Foods and Animal Testing
- Replacing Animal Tests With Stem Cells
- Suffering of Lab Animal Technicians
- Rapid Information Sharing to Reduce Animal Tests
- Using Biochips Instead of Animals for Testing
- Human Infections from Animal Testing Labs
- Improving Transparency in British Animal Testing


Re: Food Production and Animal Testing
You would have to grow the food yourself and not use pesticides. Industrially farmed veg is sprayed with pesticides which…
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
Do they animal test on chimpanzees cause DNA?
Re: Who Performs Animal Testing?
Animal Testing and Experimenting is most Barbaric. 96% of all the results fail, and can't be used on Humans. A hundred and fifteen…
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
While some animal testing is not ok you also have to look at the bright side of this. Because of animal…
Re: Biomedical Research and Animal Testing
Animals don’t have much of a life than humans they also have a shorter time span than humans
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
In 2004, the FDA estimated that 92 percent of drugs that pass preclinical tests, including “pivotal” animal tests,…
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
I entirely disagree with all animal experiments. They are archaic and hideously cruel. They cannot express pain like…
Re: Who Performs Animal Testing?
In regards to animal testing by the MoD medical equipment mainly field dressings and celox gauze is tested on live animals that…
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
Is animal testing inhumane and cruel? Of course. But for example, let's say that someone has diabetes and the only…
Re: Animal Testing in the United States
I have degrees in chemistry and physics and have done cancer research before in the U.S. but stopped because drugs…